Description: This session reveals some of the varying, small information evaluators find on academic documents that determine whether they are false, authentic, official, or unofficial. This presentation will encourage evaluators to have a keen eye when reviewing documents and demonstrate that experience is relative as these credentials can throw off even the most experienced evaluators.
Presenter Biography: Bernard Ramos has worked in many roles and has presented at numerous conferences on international education. The scope of his expertise is broad and covers topics such as various systems of education, developing a tailored system for evaluating credentials and theoretical concepts. With almost 14 years of experience, he has conducted training workshops at many universities and helped admissions offices develop highly reliable practices in credential evaluation. Bernard studied at DePaul and Sciences-Po Paris, and he is the Vice President and a Senior Evaluator at Educational Perspectives.
Organization: Educational Perspectives (EP) is a not-for-profit international education research organization and a member of the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services (NACES). They prepare evaluation reports and provide training workshops, consulting, and translation services. Educational Perspectives is based in Chicago and a signatory to the Groningen Declaration.
Free and open to TAICEP members and non-members. REGISTER HERE!
March 3: Fraud and Verification Tools; register at: http://bit.ly/2vieq86
Description: Here are some ways for credential evaluators to get to what they want faster, and keep what’s found for future reference. Included are some browser tricks, PDF manipulation, and wiki suggestions.
Presenter Bio: Michael Rohaly has been working as a credential evaluator for the International Credential Evaluation Service for over twenty years. Currently he is responsible for most countries using Arabic or Cyrillic characters.
About the International Credential Evaluation Service: The International Credential Evaluation Service (ICES) is the provincially mandated credential evaluation service in British Columbia. We are also a member of the Alliance of Credential Evaluation Services of Canada (ACESC). ICES performs evaluations for professional and educational organizations, and also for immigration purposes in an agreement with the government of Canada.
Free! Open to TAICEP members and non-members.
Description: This TAYD session will update you on European national or exam boards credential responses to COVID-19 ( secondary education only).
Alistair Wylie, Head of Service Technology, Engineering and Construction – Qualifications Development Directorate, Scottish Qualifications Authority
Paul Teulon, Head of Global Recognition IB
Diana Hense, Head Admissions Office, University of Amsterdam
Free! Open to TAICEP members and non-members. This session will be recorded.
In some countries, however, government recognition of an institution and accreditation of a program are *both* required in order for a degree to be fully recognized. To make things even more exciting, it is common for institutions to offer both: some programs that are accredited & fall under the auspices of the Ministry of Education or other higher education authority and some programs that are aimed at those wanting an employment qualification or who aren’t aware of that institutions might offer programs that don’t fit within the legally recognized degree system.
These non-official, non-recognized proprietary programs do not provide access to further education at public higher education institutions or employment in government jobs, but they may have validity for employment in the private sector. Proprietary programs often have more flexible entrance requirements or a shorter duration than recognized & accredited programs. They are also often advertised to international students rather than local graduates. Sometimes these proprietary, institution-specific programs are known by special names such as Titulo Propio or Lato Sensu, but in other cases, identifying validated and non-validated programs requires serious research.